A Complete Bible Study on Giants in the Bible
Genesis 6:4, Numbers 13:33, Deuteronomy 2:10-21, Deuteronomy 3:11, Joshua 11:21-22, 1 Samuel 17:4, and 2 Samuel 21:15-22.
Nephilim, Anakim, Rephaim, Emim, Zamzummim, some Amorites, and the giant line connected with Gath.
Giants in Scripture were literal and formidable, but they were never outside the rule, judgment, or redemptive plan of God.
Scope of This Study
This study gives a broad biblical overview of giants in Scripture. It is not meant to replace the more detailed Unforsaken study on Genesis 6 and the Nephilim. For that fuller treatment, see A Complete Bible Study on the Nephilim.
The shorter page still needs to be clear. The Bible does not present giants as fairy tale creatures or symbolic fears. It names peoples, locations, kings, warriors, measurements, battles, and defeats. These details belong to history. They also belong to theology, because the giant clans often appear where God’s covenant promises are being resisted.
This page catalogs the main giant peoples and individuals in Scripture, while the related Nephilim study handles Genesis 6 in greater depth.
The Nephilim
The first major passage is Genesis 6:4. The NKJV reads “giants,” and the Hebrew term behind that word is Nephilim. The verse places them in the days before the Flood and also says they appeared afterward.
Genesis connects them with the sons of God taking the daughters of men and producing mighty men of renown. The related Unforsaken Nephilim study treats that as angelic rebellion, not as ordinary marriages between Sethites and Cainites.
The point for this broader catalog is simple: the Bible introduces the Nephilim as a real presence on the earth, ties them to an extraordinary rebellion before the Flood, and later uses the same term in the report from Canaan. The passage is not given to feed curiosity. It explains a serious corruption of the created order and prepares the reader for later giant clans in the land.
The Sons of God and the Boundary They Crossed
The longer Unforsaken study argues that the sons of God in Genesis 6 were heavenly beings who crossed a boundary God had established. That conclusion is not based on mythology. It comes from comparing Genesis 6 with the way the phrase is used in Job and with the New Testament warnings in Jude and 2 Peter.
And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day.
Jude 1:6
For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly.
2 Peter 2:4-5
This study does not need to repeat every argument from the larger Nephilim page, but it should not retreat from its conclusion. The giants in Scripture are part of a biblical world where supernatural rebellion, human violence, divine judgment, and covenant preservation are all real. Scripture gives enough to identify the reality and the danger, while leaving some details unexplained.
That restraint matters for faithful interpretation. We can say the Nephilim were literal. We can say Genesis 6 connects them with angelic rebellion. We can say later giant peoples appear in Canaan. We should not pretend the Bible gives a full biological or historical mechanism for every post-flood appearance. The Lord has revealed what His people need for faith, obedience, and warning.
Nephilim is the Hebrew term rendered “giants” in Genesis 6:4 and Numbers 13:33 in the NKJV. Gibbor, translated “mighty men” or “mighty one” in some passages, describes strength or dominance, but it does not by itself prove that every person called mighty was a giant.
The Main Giant Peoples Named in Scripture
Several group names appear in the Old Testament giant passages. They are not all introduced in one clean dictionary entry, so the reader has to follow the way Moses, Joshua, and later writers use them. The repeated point is physical intimidation joined to real history: peoples, lands, cities, and battles.
The Anakim were descendants of Anak and became the most feared giant-associated people in the conquest narrative. The spies saw them in Canaan, Moses later described them as great and tall, and Joshua eventually cut them off from the mountain regions of Israel’s land. Their presence helps explain why the wilderness generation trembled at the border.
A people great and tall, the descendants of the Anakim, whom you know, and of whom you heard it said, “Who can stand before the descendants of Anak?”
Deuteronomy 9:2
And at that time Joshua came and cut off the Anakim from the mountains: from Hebron, from Debir, from Anab, from all the mountains of Judah, and from all the mountains of Israel; Joshua utterly destroyed them with their cities.
Joshua 11:21
The Rephaim appear as a broader giant classification. Deuteronomy connects them with other names used by neighboring peoples. The Emim had lived in Moab’s region, and the Zamzummim had lived in the region associated with Ammon. Moses explains that these peoples were considered giants like the Anakim, while different nations used different names for them.
The Emim had dwelt there in times past, a people as great and numerous and tall as the Anakim. They were also regarded as giants, like the Anakim, but the Moabites call them Emim.
Deuteronomy 2:10-11
That was also regarded as a land of giants; giants formerly dwelt there. But the Ammonites call them Zamzummim, a people as great and numerous and tall as the Anakim.
Deuteronomy 2:20-21
These names should not be flattened into a single simple label. Scripture gives regional and family terms because the history is concrete. The same kind of people could be known by different names among different nations. The text is doing historical work rather than creating a loose monster category.
Amos also describes the Amorite with language of extraordinary height and strength. That does not mean every Amorite individual was a giant in the same technical sense as Anakim or Rephaim. It does show that Israel remembered some Amorite power as overwhelming by ordinary human measure, and that God emphasized His own role in destroying them before Israel.
Yet it was I who destroyed the Amorite before them, whose height was like the height of the cedars, and he was as strong as the oaks; yet I destroyed his fruit above and his roots beneath.
Amos 2:9
Og King of Bashan
Og king of Bashan is one of the clearest named giants because Scripture identifies him as remaining from the remnant of the giants and gives the dimensions of his iron bedstead. The measurement anchors the account in physical reality. Moses is not asking the reader to imagine a vague symbol of fear. He points to a known object associated with a real king.
For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of the giants. Indeed his bedstead was an iron bedstead. Is it not in Rabbah of the people of Ammon? Nine cubits is its length and four cubits its width, according to the standard cubit.
Deuteronomy 3:11
Og’s defeat also belongs to the larger story of Israel receiving what God promised. The Lord did not tell Israel that the enemies were imaginary. He taught them that real enemies were still subject to His word. Og’s size did not make him sovereign. His military strength did not cancel the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Giants in Canaan and Israel’s Fear
Numbers 13 shows Israel facing real giants at the border of the promised land. The spies were not wrong to see danger. They were wrong to let danger overrule God’s promise.
The report names the descendants of Anak and then uses Nephilim language. The men describe themselves as grasshoppers in their own sight. Their fear spread through the congregation until Israel refused to enter the land.
Joshua’s Campaign Against the Anakim
Joshua 11 gives a crucial historical bridge between the wilderness report and the later giants of Gath. The spies saw Anakim and drew the wrong conclusion. Joshua later faced Anakim and obeyed the Lord. The difference was not the size of the enemy. The difference was faith in the God who had spoken.
The passage names Hebron, Debir, Anab, Judah, and Israel. That specificity keeps the reader grounded. These were not floating legends. They were peoples in places, and Joshua’s campaign dealt with them in the land God had promised. The text also explains why giants later appear in Philistine territory: remnants remained in Gaza, Gath, and Ashdod.
This is why Goliath’s connection to Gath is so significant. David’s battle in 1 Samuel 17 is not detached from the conquest story. It continues a conflict that had already been introduced under Moses and Joshua. The Lord was still showing that the strongest enemies in the land could not cancel His promise.
None of the Anakim were left in the land of the children of Israel; they remained only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod.
Joshua 11:22
David, Goliath, and the Giants of Gath
Goliath is the most famous giant in Scripture. He came from Gath, one of the places where Joshua 11 says Anakim remained. His size was terrifying, but David understood the battle as defiance against the living God.
Saul and Israel heard Goliath’s challenge and were afraid. David heard the same words and asked why an uncircumcised Philistine should defy the armies of the living God. David did not deny the visible threat, but he interpreted the threat under God’s covenant. The issue was not David’s youth against Goliath’s height. The issue was the honor of the Lord who had bound Himself to Israel.
David’s victory also looks forward. He became the king through whose line the Messiah would come. The defeat of Goliath was therefore more than a memorable battlefield moment. It belonged to the preservation of the house of David and the promise that would finally be fulfilled in Jesus Christ, the true Son of David.
Named Giants and Giant Warriors
The Bible also names individual giants or men tied to giant lines. Goliath is introduced as a champion from Gath, and his height is given as six cubits and a span. The point of 1 Samuel 17 is not that David was naturally braver than every other Israelite. David saw Goliath’s challenge as defiance against the armies of the living God.
Later passages show that Goliath was not an isolated case. Ishbi-Benob tried to kill David and was struck down by Abishai. Saph, also called Sippai in 1 Chronicles 20:4, was killed by Sibbechai. Lahmi, the brother of Goliath, was killed by Elhanan according to 1 Chronicles 20:5. Another man of great stature from Gath had six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot, and Jonathan the son of Shimea killed him.
Second Samuel 21 closes the list by saying these four were born to the giant in Gath and fell by David and his servants. David’s victory over Goliath began a larger conflict that his servants continued. God preserved His people through David and through those who were loyal to the king He had anointed.
These four were born to the giant in Gath, and fell by the hand of David and by the hand of his servants.
2 Samuel 21:22
Possible Giants and Careful Categories
Some figures are associated with giant language or giant families without being explicitly called giants. Nimrod is called a mighty one, but Scripture does not call him a Nephilim. Arba, Sheshai, Ahiman, Talmai, and Benaiah’s Egyptian opponent are stronger examples of men tied to great stature or giant-associated lines.
Where the Bible Requires Restraint
A faithful study of giants must reject two opposite errors. The first error is embarrassment. Some readers try to soften the passages until giants become symbols, tribal memories, or exaggerations. That approach does not fit the way Scripture gives names, places, measurements, and battle records.
The second error is sensationalism. Scripture does not give permission to build doctrine from folklore, online claims, modern rumors, or noncanonical books. Extra-biblical traditions may show that ancient peoples remembered unusual beings, but they cannot govern the meaning of Genesis, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Samuel, or Chronicles.
Nimrod is a good example of restraint. Genesis calls him a mighty one and a mighty hunter before the Lord, and his kingdom begins with Babel. That language connects him to strength, domination, and rebellion, but the Bible does not explicitly call him a Nephilim or a giant. A careful reader can note the association without turning it into a settled claim.
What the Giant Accounts Establish
The giant passages are not recorded to make God’s people fascinated with size, bloodlines, or hidden history. They show that rebellion can look overwhelming, that fear can become unbelief, and that the Lord keeps His promises against enemies stronger than His people.
From Moses to Joshua to David, the pattern is consistent. The giants oppose God’s people, but God preserves the line through which the Messiah would come. Human might falls before the covenant faithfulness of the Lord.
This also explains why the page should not become a novelty chart. The Bible does name tribes and individuals, and those details should be preserved, but the details serve the larger testimony of God’s rule. The Lord judged the corruption of Noah’s day, brought Israel through enemies greater and mightier than themselves, cut off the Anakim from the land, and raised up David when Goliath defied His name. Each account teaches the reader to interpret visible strength under the authority of God’s spoken promise.
The accounts also train the conscience to read frightening history with reverence. God does not ask His people to pretend enemies are small. Israel’s enemies were often stronger, taller, better armed, and settled in fortified cities. The failure of unbelief was not honest recognition of danger. The failure was treating danger as greater than the Lord’s oath. That distinction matters for every generation. Faith does not erase facts. Faith receives the facts under the God who speaks, commands, judges, saves, and keeps covenant.
How the Reader Should Respond
The giant passages test how we read frightening parts of Scripture. A naturalistic reader wants to explain them away because they sound strange. A sensational reader wants to make them the center of everything. A faithful reader lets Scripture speak with its own weight, accepts the history God gives, and keeps the focus where the Bible keeps it: the Lord’s authority over rebellion.
These accounts also expose the danger of fear. Israel did not fall in the wilderness because the Anakim were stronger than expected. Israel fell because the people refused to trust the Lord who had already judged Egypt, opened the sea, fed them in the wilderness, and promised the land. Fear becomes sin when it makes God’s Word seem smaller than the obstacle in front of us.
The answer is not self-confidence. David did not defeat Goliath by discovering hidden strength within himself. He came in the name of the Lord. Joshua did not defeat the Anakim because Israel was naturally superior. He obeyed the command of God. The point is covenant faithfulness, not human hype.
For believers today, the giants in Scripture teach sober courage. We are not called to chase hidden lore, and we are not called to tremble before powers that oppose God. We are called to believe the Word, test every claim by Scripture, reject fear-driven unbelief, and trust Jesus Christ. He is the promised Seed, the true Son of David, and the King before whom every enemy will fall.
The Biblical Conclusion
The Bible presents giants as literal historical peoples and individuals. The Nephilim, Anakim, Rephaim, Emim, Zamzummim, Og, Goliath, and the giants of Gath all belong to the historical record of Scripture.
The names and places are part of the lesson. God did not leave His people with a vague warning about frightening enemies. He recorded families, regions, kings, cities, battles, measurements, victories, and remnants, so the reader can see that His promises held in ordinary history. Faith is strengthened when God’s rule is traced through real events.
The final lesson is not fear. The giants fell. God’s promises stood. Jesus Christ, the true Son of David, came through the preserved covenant line, shed His blood for sinners, rose bodily, and will reign as King. That hope is stronger than every ancient enemy and every modern fear.
That is where the study should leave the reader. The Bible gives enough detail to make the giants historically serious, but it gives even more reason to trust the God who judged rebellion and preserved redemption. The reader should come away believing Scripture more firmly, fearing man less deeply, and refusing both embarrassment and sensationalism. The strongest enemies in the biblical record could not stop the promise of God, and no present enemy can overthrow the reign of Christ.
Giants in the Bible were real, formidable opponents, but Scripture records them under God’s judgment and beneath His covenant purposes.
- How does Genesis 6:4 establish the Nephilim as part of the historical record rather than a symbolic warning?
- Why should the report of the spies in Numbers 13 be handled carefully without denying the reality of the Anakim?
- What does Deuteronomy teach by naming the Emim, Zamzummim, Rephaim, and Anakim in real lands and histories?
- How does Og’s bedstead show the concreteness of the record while still requiring restraint about exact height claims?
- Why did David’s faith interpret Goliath through God’s covenant rather than through visible size and military fear?
- How do these accounts warn against both embarrassment over Scripture and fascination with hidden lore?