A Complete Bible Study on the Feast of Unleavened Bread
Why did God tell Israel to remove leaven and eat unleavened bread for seven days? The feast began with a real night of deliverance, and the New Testament later uses its imagery to teach Christ’s church. We need to keep those two settings together without turning Israel’s feast into a ritual command for Christians.
The Memorial God Gave Israel
The Feast of Unleavened Bread began when the LORD brought Israel out of Egypt. For seven days the people were to remove leaven from their homes and eat bread made without it. The first and seventh days were sacred assemblies. By placing the observance into Israel’s calendar, God made the exodus part of the nation’s yearly life. Children who had never seen Egypt would still hear how the LORD rescued their ancestors and learn that Israel did not deliver itself.
That historical starting point controls everything that follows. The New Testament gives the feast’s imagery a clear moral application in 1 Corinthians 5, where Paul tells a church to reject corrupting wickedness. His application does not erase what the bread first meant to Israel, and it does not make every biblical use of leaven a symbol of sin. It also does not turn ritual food into a way for Christians to become holy. We need to begin with the exodus as a real event. Paul’s church setting then explains his use of the image, while the completed work of Christ governs the Christian application.
Passover and Unleavened Bread stand side by side, but they are not exactly the same observance. The Passover sacrifice was associated with the fourteenth day of the first month. The seven-day feast began on the fifteenth. Because the observances met at the evening boundary and remembered the same deliverance, Scripture can use “Passover” for the wider season. The original commands still let us see the distinction. Passover centers on the lamb and the blood-marked houses when judgment fell on Egypt. Unleavened Bread carries the remembrance through the following week.
"So this day shall be to you a memorial; and you shall keep it as a feast to the LORD throughout your generations. You shall keep it as a feast by an everlasting ordinance. Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread. On the first day you shall remove leaven from your houses. For whoever eats leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that person shall be cut off from Israel. On the first day there shall be a holy convocation, and on the seventh day there shall be a holy convocation for you. No manner of work shall be done on them; but that which everyone must eat–that only may be prepared by you. So you shall observe the Feast of Unleavened Bread, for on this same day I will have brought your armies out of the land of Egypt. Therefore you shall observe this day throughout your generations as an everlasting ordinance. In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at evening, you shall eat unleavened bread, until the twenty-first day of the month at evening. For seven days no leaven shall be found in your houses, since whoever eats what is leavened, that same person shall be cut off from the congregation of Israel, whether he is a stranger or a native of the land. You shall eat nothing leavened; in all your dwellings you shall eat unleavened bread."'
Exodus 12:14-20
God calls the day a memorial and attaches obedience to that memory. Leaven was removed from Israelite houses, and anyone who ate leavened bread during the appointed days faced the covenant consequence of being “cut off” from Israel. The expression describes exclusion from the covenant community and its privileges, although this passage does not explain every human procedure or the exact earthly penalty in each case. The first and seventh days were holy convocations, which means the people gathered before the LORD and set ordinary work aside.
This was much more than a dietary suggestion. Israel’s homes and meals testified that the LORD had acted for His people. Their work stopped for the sacred assemblies, and their calendar repeated the witness every year. They did not invent a custom and add religious meaning later. God established the observance and told them what it meant. The phrase “everlasting ordinance” belongs with “throughout your generations” and with the covenant people being addressed. It declares an enduring ordinance for Israel; it does not by itself place the Mosaic calendar upon the church.
Then he called for Moses and Aaron by night, and said, "Rise, go out from among my people, both you and the children of Israel. And go, serve the LORD as you have said. Also take your flocks and your herds, as you have said, and be gone; and bless me also." And the Egyptians urged the people, that they might send them out of the land in haste. For they said, "We shall all be dead." So the people took their dough before it was leavened, having their kneading bowls bound up in their clothes on their shoulders. Now the children of Israel had done according to the word of Moses, and they had asked from the Egyptians articles of silver, articles of gold, and clothing. And the LORD had given the people favor in the sight of the Egyptians, so that they granted them what they requested. Thus they plundered the Egyptians. Then the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides children. A mixed multitude went up with them also, and flocks and herds–a great deal of livestock. And they baked unleavened cakes of the dough which they had brought out of Egypt; for it was not leavened, because they were driven out of Egypt and could not wait, nor had they prepared provisions for themselves.
Exodus 12:31-39
Exodus gives a practical picture of why the bread remained unleavened. After the death of Egypt’s firstborn, Pharaoh ordered Israel to leave. The Egyptians urged the people out because they feared that more would die. Israel carried dough that had not had time to rise, with kneading bowls wrapped in clothing and placed on their shoulders. They left with their children and livestock, along with the goods the Egyptians had given them. Yesterday they had been slaves. Now the LORD was bringing them out so quickly that ordinary bread preparation had to wait.
The haste did not create the feast on its own. Earlier in Exodus 12, God had already commanded unleavened bread with the Passover meal and prescribed the seven-day observance before the departure took place. The command and the event therefore belong together. God gave the sign, and the historical rescue filled it with a memory Israel could never honestly claim as its own achievement.
"Observe the month of Abib, and keep the Passover to the LORD your God, for in the month of Abib the LORD your God brought you out of Egypt by night. Therefore you shall sacrifice the Passover to the LORD your God, from the flock and the herd, in the place where the LORD chooses to put His name. You shall eat no leavened bread with it; seven days you shall eat unleavened bread with it, that is, the bread of affliction (for you came out of the land of Egypt in haste), that you may remember the day in which you came out of the land of Egypt all the days of your life. And no leaven shall be seen among you in all your territory for seven days, nor shall any of the meat which you sacrifice the first day at twilight remain overnight until morning. "You may not sacrifice the Passover within any of your gates which the LORD your God gives you; but at the place where the LORD your God chooses to make His name abide, there you shall sacrifice the Passover at twilight, at the going down of the sun, at the time you came out of Egypt. And you shall roast and eat it in the place which the LORD your God chooses, and in the morning you shall turn and go to your tents. Six days you shall eat unleavened bread, and on the seventh day there shall be a sacred assembly to the LORD your God. You shall do no work on it.
Deuteronomy 16:1-8
Deuteronomy calls this food the “bread of affliction” and again connects it with haste. The name does not make the bread a sinful substance or an object of misery. It recalls the bitter bondage from which God rescued Israel. Each meal trained the people to remember their suffering truthfully while giving the Deliverer all the credit. Bondage lay behind them because the LORD’s mighty hand had acted, and the land He promised lay ahead.
Deuteronomy also looks forward to worship at the place the LORD would choose. The first observance happened in Israelite homes in Egypt. Later, the national celebration was tied to the central sanctuary. Those instructions belong to different stages of the same covenant history, so we should let the practice develop as Scripture presents it. We should not flatten every detail into one ceremony and then claim that a modern meal reproduces the whole law.
The biblical words help us follow the command, but they do not hide a secret doctrine inside their syllables. The Hebrew plural matsot commonly refers to unleavened breads or cakes and appears in the feast’s name. Chamets can describe what has become leavened or fermented, while seor refers to leaven or a fermented starter kept to affect a fresh batch. The Greek azyma can name unleavened bread or, when the context calls for it, the festival season. English “leaven” may refer broadly to the starter or to what it does. Context tells us which sense is intended.
And Moses said to the people: "Remember this day in which you went out of Egypt, out of the house of bondage; for by strength of hand the LORD brought you out of this place. No leavened bread shall be eaten. On this day you are going out, in the month Abib. And it shall be, when the LORD brings you into the land of the Canaanites and the Hittites and the Amorites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, which He swore to your fathers to give you, a land flowing with milk and honey, that you shall keep this service in this month. Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread, and on the seventh day there shall be a feast to the LORD. Unleavened bread shall be eaten seven days. And no leavened bread shall be seen among you, nor shall leaven be seen among you in all your quarters. And you shall tell your son in that day, saying, "This is done because of what the LORD did for me when I came up from Egypt.' It shall be as a sign to you on your hand and as a memorial between your eyes, that the LORD's law may be in your mouth; for with a strong hand the LORD has brought you out of Egypt. You shall therefore keep this ordinance in its season from year to year.
Exodus 13:3-10
Moses begins with a direct command to remember. Israel came out of slavery by the strength of the LORD’s hand, and parents were to tell their children why the family ate this bread. The explanation was personal: “This is done because of what the LORD did for me when I came up from Egypt.” The people had to pass on more than a procedure. They were to speak honestly about the bondage and explain how the faithful God of Israel rescued them. The nation’s life rested upon what He had done.
The passage calls the observance a sign and a memorial so that the LORD’s law would remain in the people’s mouths. Eating the bread expressed covenant identity and obedience, but Israel was not rescued because its dough was chemically pure. God redeemed the nation by His power and then commanded the meal as the response of a people He had brought out. The text expressly connects the bread with haste and affliction. It never gives us a universal rule that unleavened bread always equals moral perfection.
"These are the feasts of the LORD, holy convocations which you shall proclaim at their appointed times. On the fourteenth day of the first month at twilight is the LORD's Passover. And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the Feast of Unleavened Bread to the LORD; seven days you must eat unleavened bread. On the first day you shall have a holy convocation; you shall do no customary work on it. But you shall offer an offering made by fire to the LORD for seven days. The seventh day shall be a holy convocation; you shall do no customary work on it."'
Leviticus 23:4-8
Leviticus sets the calendar plainly: Passover on the fourteenth day at twilight, followed by the feast beginning on the fifteenth. The people ate unleavened bread for seven days. They gathered on the first and seventh days, while the appointed offerings continued throughout the week. Numbers 28 adds details about those daily offerings. This sanctuary setting is easy to overlook. A modern attempt to “keep the biblical feast” cannot be reduced to avoiding yeast at home, because the full Mosaic observance included Israel’s priesthood and sacrifices. Removing leaven may be educational today, but it is not the complete law given at Sinai.
The calendar made remembrance a shared responsibility. Israel did not wait until an individual happened to feel reflective. Families prepared their homes before the nation assembled. At the sanctuary, the priests carried out the sacrifices God required. The observance interrupted ordinary work so that deliverance would not be pushed to the edge of life. At the same time, the command never allowed the people to treat the event as a private spiritual picture detached from history. The God they worshiped was the God who had acted in Egypt and brought a particular people out of bondage.
Deliverance Remembered in the Land
Exodus 13 expects a child to ask why the family is eating this bread. A ritual without explanation could become empty repetition, while teaching detached from the real exodus could become little more than a moral lesson. Israelite parents were to join the act to the history. Christian parents can receive that principle without claiming Israel’s covenant identity. We should teach children what God actually did in Scripture and explain the practices Christ gave His church, keeping His saving work clearer than any family custom.
The same care should shape how we explain baptism and Communion. A child should hear who commanded each act and what it points to. He should also understand why Christians obey. The ceremony is never the Savior. Godly memory tells the truth about bondage and rescue, then directs faith toward the One who acted. If a family uses unleavened bread to teach the exodus, that lesson should make Israel’s history clearer rather than suggesting that the family has entered Israel’s Mosaic obligation.
Now the children of Israel camped in Gilgal, and kept the Passover on the fourteenth day of the month at twilight on the plains of Jericho. And they ate of the produce of the land on the day after the Passover, unleavened bread and parched grain, on the very same day. Then the manna ceased on the day after they had eaten the produce of the land; and the children of Israel no longer had manna, but they ate the food of the land of Canaan that year.
Joshua 5:10-12
Israel kept Passover at Gilgal after crossing the Jordan and before the campaign against Jericho. The people ate unleavened bread from Canaan’s produce, and the manna ceased when they began eating what the land provided. I find the transition striking. The feast looked back to the night they left Egypt, yet their food showed that the promised land was now under their feet. The God who had fed Israel from heaven was feeding them through the land He promised to Abraham’s descendants.
Unleavened bread therefore did not belong only to the panic of departure. The annual feast carried that remembered urgency into settled life. Prosperity in Canaan was never supposed to erase the slave houses or make the people imagine that they had established themselves. They still depended upon the LORD whose mighty hand had brought them out.
Now many people, a very great assembly, gathered at Jerusalem to keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread in the second month. They arose and took away the altars that were in Jerusalem, and they took away all the incense altars and cast them into the Brook Kidron. Then they slaughtered the Passover lambs on the fourteenth day of the second month. The priests and the Levites were ashamed, and sanctified themselves, and brought the burnt offerings to the house of the LORD. They stood in their place according to their custom, according to the Law of Moses the man of God; the priests sprinkled the blood received from the hand of the Levites. For there were many in the assembly who had not sanctified themselves; therefore the Levites had charge of the slaughter of the Passover lambs for everyone who was not clean, to sanctify them to the LORD. For a multitude of the people, many from Ephraim, Manasseh, Issachar, and Zebulun, had not cleansed themselves, yet they ate the Passover contrary to what was written. But Hezekiah prayed for them, saying, "May the good LORD provide atonement for everyone who prepares his heart to seek God, the LORD God of his fathers, though he is not cleansed according to the purification of the sanctuary." And the LORD listened to Hezekiah and healed the people. So the children of Israel who were present at Jerusalem kept the Feast of Unleavened Bread seven days with great gladness; and the Levites and the priests praised the LORD day by day, singing to the LORD, accompanied by loud instruments. And Hezekiah gave encouragement to all the Levites who taught the good knowledge of the LORD; and they ate throughout the feast seven days, offering peace offerings and making confession to the LORD God of their fathers.
2 Chronicles 30:13-22
Hezekiah restored the observance during a much larger reform. The people removed unlawful altars from Jerusalem. Priests and Levites who had neglected their service were ashamed and sanctified themselves. Some worshipers came without completing the required cleansing, so Hezekiah prayed for those who had prepared their hearts to seek God. The LORD heard and healed them. This account holds earnest zeal and revealed order together. The people needed mercy, but mercy did not make disobedience harmless. The restored feast belonged to their return to the LORD.
Josiah later kept Passover and Unleavened Bread as part of covenant renewal after the Book of the Law was recovered. Scripture praises the scale and order of that observance, yet the ceremony could never replace obedience to the Word that had exposed Judah’s condition. In both reforms, renewed worship grew from taking God’s revelation seriously rather than from enjoying a religious festival for its own sake.
And the descendants of the captivity kept the Passover on the fourteenth day of the first month. For the priests and the Levites had purified themselves; all of them were ritually clean. And they slaughtered the Passover lambs for all the descendants of the captivity, for their brethren the priests, and for themselves. Then the children of Israel who had returned from the captivity ate together with all who had separated themselves from the filth of the nations of the land in order to seek the LORD God of Israel. And they kept the Feast of Unleavened Bread seven days with joy; for the LORD made them joyful, and turned the heart of the king of Assyria toward them, to strengthen their hands in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel.
Ezra 6:19-22
After the exile and the rebuilding of the temple, the returned community again kept Passover and the seven-day feast. Priests and Levites purified themselves, and those who separated from the surrounding nations’ defilement joined in seeking the LORD. Their joy is credited to God, who had turned the king’s heart and strengthened their work. The feast still testified that restoration came by divine providence. Israel’s story after Egypt continued to depend on the same faithful God.
How the Feast Leads into the Gospel Accounts
Keeping Passover and Unleavened Bread distinct helps us understand their New Testament use. Biblical writers can call the wider season Passover, or speak of Unleavened Bread while discussing preparation for the Passover meal. The Greek word pascha may refer to the sacrifice, the meal, the day, or the wider season, depending on context. This ordinary flexibility does not create a contradiction. It asks us to notice how each writer is using the term instead of forcing every occurrence into one narrow sense.
Now the Feast of Unleavened Bread drew near, which is called Passover. And the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might kill Him, for they feared the people. Then Satan entered Judas, surnamed Iscariot, who was numbered among the twelve. So he went his way and conferred with the chief priests and captains, how he might betray Him to them. And they were glad, and agreed to give him money. So he promised and sought opportunity to betray Him to them in the absence of the multitude. Then came the Day of Unleavened Bread, when the Passover must be killed. And He sent Peter and John, saying, "Go and prepare the Passover for us, that we may eat." So they said to Him, "Where do You want us to prepare?" And He said to them, "Behold, when you have entered the city, a man will meet you carrying a pitcher of water; follow him into the house which he enters. Then you shall say to the master of the house, "The Teacher says to you, "Where is the guest room where I may eat the Passover with My disciples?"' Then he will show you a large, furnished upper room; there make ready." So they went and found it just as He had said to them, and they prepared the Passover. When the hour had come, He sat down, and the twelve apostles with Him. Then He said to them, "With fervent desire I have desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer; for I say to you, I will no longer eat of it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God." Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, "Take this and divide it among yourselves; for I say to you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes." And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me." Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you.
Luke 22:1-20
Luke says that the Feast of Unleavened Bread drew near and adds that it was called Passover. He then describes the disciples preparing the meal. Jesus wanted to eat this Passover with them before He suffered, and at the table He directed their attention to His body, which would be given for them. He also spoke of the new covenant in His blood. The wider name for the season and the particular meal sit naturally in the same account.
Jesus was born under the Law and obeyed God’s commands to Israel. His faithfulness included going to Jerusalem at the appointed time. Yet when He said, “Do this in remembrance of Me,” He did not command Gentile believers to become Israel or reproduce every later Seder custom. He gave His church the bread and cup as a remembrance of His own sacrifice. Nor did He say that the bread turned into His physical body or the cup into literal blood. The signs point believers to the real body He gave and the real blood He shed.
The Gospel chronology deserves care. Matthew, Mark, and Luke speak directly about preparing and eating the Passover. John uses preparation language during the crucifixion and mentions leaders who still intended to eat the Passover. Some interpreters propose different calendars. Others explain the details by the sunset reckoning of a Jewish day or the broader use of festival language. The word translated “Preparation” could also function as the ordinary name for Friday. These are legitimate possibilities, but Scripture does not settle every modern reconstruction in one explicit timeline.
All four Gospels agree on what the gospel requires us to know. Jesus truly died during the Passover season, was buried, and rose bodily. Some teachers go further and say that His burial happened on the exact first day of Unleavened Bread, making the condition of His body in the tomb the feast’s specific fulfillment. I would not state that as settled doctrine. The New Testament never assigns that exact typological fulfillment to His burial.
"Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which God did through Him in your midst, as you yourselves also know– Him, being delivered by the determined purpose and foreknowledge of God, you have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and put to death; whom God raised up, having loosed the pains of death, because it was not possible that He should be held by it. For David says concerning Him: "I foresaw the LORD always before my face, For He is at my right hand, that I may not be shaken. Therefore my heart rejoiced, and my tongue was glad; Moreover my flesh also will rest in hope. For You will not leave my soul in Hades, Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption. You have made known to me the ways of life; You will make me full of joy in Your presence.' "Men and brethren, let me speak freely to you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. Therefore, being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that of the fruit of his body, according to the flesh, He would raise up the Christ to sit on his throne, he, foreseeing this, spoke concerning the resurrection of the Christ, that His soul was not left in Hades, nor did His flesh see corruption. This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses.
Acts 2:22-32
Peter gives us a direct apostolic claim about Jesus’ resurrection. Lawless men crucified Him according to God’s determined purpose and foreknowledge, but death could not hold Him. David’s body remained in its tomb, while the promised Christ rose and did not see corruption. This is stronger than saying that a corpse merely escaped normal decay. God raised Jesus bodily, and the apostles witnessed Him alive.
Jesus rose during the feast season, and His complete sinlessness is beyond question. This is where I think we should handle typology carefully. Scripture never says that an unleavened loaf predicted the condition of Christ’s body in the tomb. We do not need that inference to defend His sinlessness. The New Testament directly establishes His burial and bodily resurrection.
How Paul Applies the Feast to the Church
Leaven does not carry one fixed moral meaning throughout the Bible. Jesus warned about the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees, referring in context to hypocrisy or harmful teaching. Paul uses the spreading process for tolerated sexual immorality in Corinth and false persuasion in Galatia. Yet a thanksgiving peace offering included leavened bread in Leviticus 7, and the wave loaves at the Feast of Weeks were baked with leaven in Leviticus 23. Jesus also compared the kingdom to leaven hidden in meal until the whole batch was affected. God did not command sinful offerings or compare His kingdom to sin.
In this feast, removing leaven belongs first to a historical memorial. In 1 Corinthians 5, Paul takes that familiar action and uses it as an analogy for removing tolerated wickedness from a church. The image works because a small starter spreads through the dough, not because every piece of leaven in Scripture secretly means evil. Each passage must control its own symbol.
It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and such sexual immorality as is not even named among the Gentiles–that a man has his father's wife! And you are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he who has done this deed might be taken away from among you. For I indeed, as absent in body but present in spirit, have already judged (as though I were present) him who has so done this deed. In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when you are gathered together, along with my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. Your glorying is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? Therefore purge out the old leaven, that you may be a new lump, since you truly are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, was sacrificed for us. Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner–not even to eat with such a person. For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? But those who are outside God judges. Therefore "put away from yourselves the evil person."
1 Corinthians 5:1-13
The Corinthians were tolerating open sexual immorality that even the surrounding Gentiles recognized as shameful. Instead of mourning, the congregation had become proud. Paul’s command to purge the old leaven had a concrete first application: remove the unrepentant offender from fellowship. He was not telling Christians to search their pantry shelves, and he was not claiming that believers reach sinless perfection. He used Israel’s feast preparation to call the congregation back to holiness.
The end of the chapter distinguishes church judgment from God’s judgment of outsiders. Christians are not told to purge every unbeliever from society. They are responsible for what they knowingly protect among those who claim Christ’s name. Church discipline should therefore begin with evidence and follow proper order. Qualified leaders must act without favoritism, and the congregation must not turn a painful process into gossip or spectacle.
Delivering the man to Satan describes removal from the church’s protected fellowship into the world outside. The purpose reaches toward salvation rather than revenge. Discipline names evil honestly and protects others from its influence. It also warns the offender and calls him to repent. Later, 2 Corinthians tells the church to forgive and comfort a disciplined person whose sorrow had become sufficient. Scripture never expressly identifies him as the same man, so I hold that possible connection with care. That later command helps us see the purpose of discipline. When repentance is real, the church should welcome restoration.
Paul grounds the command in what Christ has already made His people: “since you truly are unleavened.” Believers do not remove wickedness to earn redemption. Christ our Passover was sacrificed for us, and conduct should agree with the new identity His saving work gives. “Let us keep the feast” describes a continuing life of sincerity and truth rather than an annual obligation. Malice and hypocrisy cannot be defended as normal parts of Christian fellowship.
This does not mean Christians never sin. When believers sin, they confess it and receive God’s cleansing. Where restitution is necessary, they make it as part of returning to obedient fellowship. Eternal security never turns grace into permission for lawlessness. Everyone truly born again is a new creation, indwelt and sealed by the Holy Spirit. At the same time, a shallow profession that stubbornly protects evil should not be treated as automatic proof of the new birth.
What Christ’s Church Is Commanded to Remember
That brings us to a practical question: must Christians keep this feast every year? Colossians 2 helps answer it by placing Israel’s festival calendar in relation to Christ.
And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross. Having disarmed principalities and powers, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it. So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ. Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom all the body, nourished and knit together by joints and ligaments, grows with the increase that is from God. Therefore, if you died with Christ from the basic principles of the world, why, as though living in the world, do you subject yourselves to regulations– "Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle," which all concern things which perish with the using–according to the commandments and doctrines of men? These things indeed have an appearance of wisdom in self-imposed religion, false humility, and neglect of the body, but are of no value against the indulgence of the flesh.
Colossians 2:13-23
Paul tells believers not to accept condemnation over food, drink, festivals, new moons, or Sabbaths. Those observances were shadows, while the substance belongs to Christ. The Feast of Unleavened Bread was God’s true command to Israel, not a foolish human rule. Even so, the New Testament never places the church under it as an annual obligation. The apostles did not require Gentiles to use Israel’s calendar, remove leaven from their homes, travel to Jerusalem, or present temple offerings.
Calling the feast a shadow does not make the Old Testament false or useless. A shadow reveals the shape of a coming reality. We study this feast because it displays God’s historical faithfulness and gives background to Paul’s call for church holiness. We do not return to the shadow as though Christ’s finished work were incomplete or as though keeping selected food rules could make someone righteous before God.
A Jewish believer may retain cultural feast practices while confessing Christ. A Gentile Christian may attend an educational meal or remove leaven as a teaching exercise, while another believer may choose not to participate. Romans 14 teaches Christians to honor the Lord in disputed observance of days without despising one another. Colossians forbids condemnation over festivals and food, and Galatians rejects law observance as a way of being justified. No optional feast practice earns salvation or gives someone a higher rank in the church.
Accuracy also matters when churches teach about the feast. The commands in Scripture should be distinguished from Jewish customs that developed later. A reconstructed meal may help people learn, but a church should not claim that it perfectly duplicates the Last Supper. Respect for Jewish people requires telling the truth about what comes from the Bible and what comes from later tradition.
Communion is the remembrance Christ commanded His church. The bread and cup direct us to His body and blood, and believers proclaim His death until He comes. The elements remain bread and the fruit of the vine. They do not become Christ’s physical flesh and blood, cause salvation, or repeat the cross. Christ offered Himself once for sins and lives forever as our High Priest. Communion calls each believer to self-examination and a proper discernment of the body. At the same time, the shared meal expresses the church’s fellowship and looks toward Christ’s bodily return.
The Passover setting helps us understand the meal, but the New Testament does not command churches to rebuild the whole seven-day observance whenever they gather. Christ chose the bread and cup and told His disciples to remember Him. Paul passes that command to the church and adds that believers proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes. The remembrance therefore looks backward to a finished sacrifice and forward to a bodily return. It also speaks to the present congregation: people redeemed by one Lord should not approach His table while proudly defending the kind of sin that tears fellowship apart.
The feast ultimately directs our attention to the greater redemption Christ accomplished. Israel’s exodus was a real deliverance from Pharaoh’s slavery. Jesus is the eternal Son, fully God and fully man, born of a virgin and completely sinless. Wicked men physically tortured and killed Him. He willingly bore that real punishment for our sins in His innocent body, shed His blood, died, was buried, and rose bodily. The Father did not punish, curse, abandon, strike, bruise, or pour wrath upon Jesus. Father and Son remained united in the work of redemption.
Christ died for the whole world, and God genuinely offers salvation to every person even though people may resist and finally reject Him. Everyone who repents and believes in Jesus is forgiven and declared righteous before God. That person is born again, made new, indwelt by the Holy Spirit, sealed by Him, and eternally secure. No ritual can accomplish this. Eating unleavened bread cannot replace faith, and neither ancestry nor church membership can save. Baptism and Communion cannot take Christ’s place.
The proper response is to receive Christ and remember what He has done. Those who belong to Him should let redemption shape the way they live together. For a fuller look at the adjoining observance, see The Passover. The way Jesus used leaven elsewhere is examined in The Parable of the Leaven. The Gospel chronology receives a separate treatment in The Moment Jesus Died.
My Final Thoughts
After following this feast from Egypt into the New Testament, I believe its first purpose was to make Israel remember a deliverance God had actually accomplished for them. Paul then uses its familiar picture to call Christ’s church away from defended sin, because Christ our Passover has already been sacrificed for us. We do not honor that truth by placing ourselves under Israel’s calendar or by trusting a ritual to make us clean. We honor Christ by resting in His finished work and allowing the redemption He gave us to shape our shared life in sincerity and truth.