Some Christians have been told they lack the Holy Spirit because they have never spoken in tongues. Others assume every present claim must be fraudulent. Acts and 1 Corinthians give us grounds for evaluating both assertions, and they require more care than accepting a practice simply because it is familiar.
What Tongues Are and What Pentecost Shows
The Holy Spirit is a divine Person who distributes gifts according to His will. Wanting a manifestation intensely does not give us control over Him, and receiving a conspicuous gift does not make someone a superior Christian. He gives gifts to benefit Christ’s body.
Acts 2 provides the clearest description of the speech itself. People from different regions recognized their own languages as the disciples declared God’s works. I understand the biblical gift of tongues to be supernatural speech in a real language the speaker did not acquire through ordinary learning. A translator’s work and a missionary’s language study can be valuable ways God provides help, but they are different from the miracle Luke records.
Pentecost was the Jewish Feast of Weeks, which brought worshipers from many regions to Jerusalem. The disciples had been waiting in obedience to Christ’s promise of power for their witness. Luke describes a sound from heaven like a mighty rushing wind and divided tongues like fire resting upon them. Both the visible sign and the Spirit-enabled speech belonged to the event, but we need to distinguish what people saw from what they heard (Acts 2:1-21).
And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. And there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men, from every nation under heaven. And when this sound occurred, the multitude came together, and were confused, because everyone heard them speak in his own language. Then they were all amazed and marveled, saying to one another, “Look, are not all these who speak Galileans? And how is it that we hear, each in our own language in which we were born?”
The shapes appeared “as of fire”; Luke does not say literal flames burned the disciples. When they spoke with “other tongues,” however, the listeners recognized the languages in which they had been born. The Spirit had enabled Galileans to declare God’s wonderful works across real language boundaries. The hearers were amazed because they understood, not because the speech was meaningless.
The declarations of God’s works were followed by an understandable explanation of the gospel. Peter stood with the eleven, answered the mockery, and explained what was happening from Joel. He then proclaimed the crucified and risen Messiah and called the people to repent. The sign had drawn their attention, but they still needed to hear who Jesus was and what He had done.
The Greek noun glōssa (γλῶσσα) can mean the physical tongue or a language; Thayer’s entry lists those senses. Acts 2:4 uses heterais glōssais, other tongues. Luke then uses dialektos in verses 6 and 8 for a recognizable language or dialect, as explained in the entry for that word. The crowd’s own description establishes what those terms mean here.
Acts 1 names the apostles and also describes a larger company of disciples. When chapter 2 says “they were all” together and filled, I allow for that wider company rather than insist that only the Twelve could have spoken. Luke emphasizes the Spirit’s enabling of the speakers and the hearers’ recognition of their own languages.
Pentecost marked a turning point in God’s work of redemption. The sound from heaven, the visible sign, and the languages belonged to that historic outpouring. Luke does not require every later conversion to reproduce the same sequence.
Acts 10 and 19 at Gospel Boundaries
In Acts 10, God sent Peter to the home of Cornelius, a Gentile centurion. He had prepared Cornelius to hear the message and corrected Peter’s reluctance to enter a Gentile home. Jewish believers accompanied Peter and witnessed what God did there. Their testimony would help settle whether Gentiles could be fully received without becoming Jews (Acts 10:34-48).
While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God. Then Peter answered, “Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then they asked him to stay a few days.
Peter proclaimed Jesus’ ministry, His death at wicked hands, and His bodily resurrection. He identified Him as the appointed Judge and announced that whoever believes in Him receives remission of sins. While Peter was speaking, the Spirit fell on those hearing the word. The Jewish believers heard them speaking in tongues and magnifying God. They were astonished that the gift of the Spirit had been poured out on Gentiles too.
Peter could hardly refuse water baptism to people whom God had already received. They heard the gospel and received the Spirit before water baptism, so neither the water nor their speaking produced salvation. In Acts 11, Peter defended what happened by explaining that the Spirit fell as He had on them “at the beginning.” The church then acknowledged that God had granted Gentiles repentance to life. This sign showed that the Gentile believers shared in the same gift of the Spirit.
The account gives us no technique for obtaining tongues or requirement that every later convert speak them. As the gospel reached Gentiles, God supplied evidence that those who believed in Jesus belonged fully to Him. The church needed to recognize their acceptance in Christ.
Acts 19 describes about twelve men in Ephesus who knew only John’s baptism. John had called people to repentance and directed them to the Messiah who was coming. These men needed to understand that Jesus had fulfilled John’s announcement, and their answer about the Holy Spirit led Paul to ask more about their baptism (Acts 19:1-7).
he said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” So they said to him, “We have not so much as heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.” And he said to them, “Into what then were you baptized?” So they said, “Into John’s baptism.” Then Paul said, “John indeed baptized with a baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they should believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.” When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.
Paul explained that John had told people to believe in Christ Jesus. The men were baptized in the Lord’s name, and when Paul laid hands on them, the Spirit came upon them and they spoke in tongues and prophesied. Luke calls them disciples while recording how much they still needed to hear about Jesus and the Spirit. We are reading about a group moving from John’s preparatory ministry to the apostolic proclamation of its fulfillment.
I would not use this event to establish a permanent class of Christians who belong to Jesus yet lack His Spirit until someone gives them a further experience. Romans 8:9 says that anyone without the Spirit of Christ does not belong to Him. Paul also teaches that all believers have been baptized by one Spirit into one body. We need to read the circumstances at Ephesus alongside those statements, rather than turn them into a second level of Christian membership.
One Spirit, Different Gifts, and the Way of Love
Corinth needed correction about the value and use of spiritual gifts. Paul began by directing the church to the confession of Jesus as Lord through the Holy Spirit, then explained how many gifts serve one body. Their variety comes from the same God. No believer has grounds to despise another member because that person’s service looks different (1 Corinthians 12:1-13).
to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another discerning of spirits, to another different kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues. But one and the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually as He wills. For as the body is one and has many members, but all the members of that one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ. For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body–whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free–and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.
Tongues and interpretation appear among many gifts. An eye, hand, and foot do different work, yet each belongs to the body and needs the others. In the same way, a believer whose gift draws attention still needs people whose service is less conspicuous. No gift makes us independent of the rest of Christ’s body.
In verse 13, Paul includes all believers in baptism by one Spirit into one body. Jews and Greeks, slaves and free people share that reality, whether or not they have the gift of tongues. He makes the difference between belonging to the body and possessing a particular gift even clearer at the chapter’s end (1 Corinthians 12:27-31).
Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles? Do all have gifts of healings? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? But earnestly desire the best gifts. And yet I show you a more excellent way.
Paul’s questions expect the answer no. Not everyone is an apostle, prophet, or teacher, and neither do all work miracles, heal, speak in tongues, or interpret. Requiring tongues as proof of salvation contradicts the distribution he describes. Someone who genuinely belongs to Christ has His Spirit even if he has never spoken in tongues. Having the gift does not admit anyone to a higher class of believer.
The more excellent way Paul now describes is love. Chapter 13 continues his correction of their church life, so we should not treat it as a passage intended only for weddings. These believers could possess remarkable gifts and still treat one another disgracefully. No manifestation would compensate for that lack of love.
Love never fails. But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect has come, then that which is in part will be done away. When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things. For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I shall know just as I also am known. And now abide faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love.
The phrase “tongues of men and of angels” begins a series of extraordinary possibilities: understanding all mysteries, possessing all knowledge, having mountain-moving faith, and surrendering every possession and even one’s body. Paul says none of it profits him without love (1 Corinthians 13:1-3). I do not understand this as a definition of a special angelic prayer vocabulary. He is pressing the necessity of love even if someone possessed the most remarkable abilities imaginable. Elsewhere in Scripture, when angels address people, the people understand their words.
Paul does say that tongues will cease and that prophecy and partial knowledge will pass away, while love endures. The disagreement concerns when those temporary gifts reach their end. One argument for cessation, the ending of certain miraculous gifts, identifies “that which is perfect” with the completed New Testament. Yet Paul connects the coming fullness with seeing “face to face” and knowing as he is known. He names neither the completed canon nor the death of the last apostle as the point when tongues must end. I reject that cessationist conclusion and believe the Spirit continues to give gifts today.
Continuing gifts do not mean that every congregation receives every gift in every century. The Spirit distributes as He wills. We cannot manufacture what He has not supplied, and a gift He does give must still be used with the love and order He commands.
A Sign That Must Be Understood
Paul’s instructions in chapter 14 require us to consider the hearer. He quotes Isaiah 28 when explaining tongues as a sign to unbelievers. He calls the passage “the law,” using that expression broadly for the authoritative Old Testament Scriptures. Isaiah’s warning concerned people who had refused God’s understandable instruction and would encounter the foreign speech of invaders (Isaiah 28:9-13).
For with stammering lips and another tongue He will speak to this people, To whom He said, “This is the rest with which You may cause the weary to rest,” And, “This is the refreshing”; Yet they would not hear. But the word of the LORD was to them, “Precept upon precept, precept upon precept, Line upon line, line upon line, Here a little, there a little,” That they might go and fall backward, and be broken And snared and caught.
I understand the opening questions as the leaders mocking instruction they considered fit only for children. Readers differ about who is speaking in those verses, but the refusal to hear and the coming judgment through foreign speech are clear. The NET Bible’s notes discuss both the alternatives and the invasion behind verse 11. God had offered rest, yet the people would not listen.
The foreign speech Isaiah describes exposed unbelief and announced judgment. It was not automatically a blessing to its hearers. We need to carry that warning into Paul’s explanation of tongues as a sign and read it with what he says next: visitors may think the congregation has lost its mind if everyone speaks in tongues. A sign can expose unbelief without supplying the understandable instruction an unbeliever needs (1 Corinthians 14:21-25).
Paul makes the need for understanding plain through instruments and ordinary languages. A trumpet that gives no clear signal cannot prepare people for battle. A spoken language has meaning, but a hearer who does not know it cannot understand the message. Paul would rather use five understandable words to teach the church than ten thousand in a tongue (1 Corinthians 14:6-19).
Pursue love, and desire spiritual gifts, but especially that you may prophesy. For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries. But he who prophesies speaks edification and exhortation and comfort to men. He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church. I wish you all spoke with tongues, but even more that you prophesied; for he who prophesies is greater than he who speaks with tongues, unless indeed he interprets, that the church may receive edification.
Some English Bibles use “unknown tongue,” adding “unknown” to clarify that the speech is not understood. The received Greek contains no separate adjective establishing a heavenly category of language, and the NKJV reads “a tongue.” Interpreters disagree about whether Corinth’s speech differed from Pentecost. I understand Paul to be describing meaningful language unknown to the listeners. Interpretation makes its meaning available to them. A sermon in a language I do not know may be perfectly intelligible to its speaker’s countrymen while leaving me unable to follow it.
Paul acknowledges that someone may give thanks well while the listener cannot say amen. Here, amen expresses knowing agreement, which I cannot give if I do not understand the thanksgiving. Sincerity does not remove the speaker’s responsibility to the people listening. Interpretation allows the congregation to receive the meaning and be built up. Paul calls this building up of the church edification (1 Corinthians 14:16-17).
The references to prayer, mysteries, and personal edification deserve an honest hearing too. Paul says that if he prays in a tongue, his spirit prays while his understanding is unfruitful. He does not tell the church to pursue unfruitful understanding as an achievement. He resolves to pray and sing with both spirit and understanding and tells the tongue speaker to pray for interpretation (1 Corinthians 14:13-15).
If anyone speaks in a tongue, let there be two or at the most three, each in turn, and let one interpret. But if there is no interpreter, let him keep silent in church, and let him speak to himself and to God. Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge. But if anything is revealed to another who sits by, let the first keep silent. For you can all prophesy one by one, that all may learn and all may be encouraged. And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. For God is not the author of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints. Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says. And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is shameful for women to speak in church.
Paul gives instructions a congregation can follow. Two may speak in tongues, or at most three, each in turn, with one interpreting. Without an interpreter, the tongue speaker must remain silent in church. Prophetic speech is limited and weighed as well, and the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. No claim that the Spirit makes restraint impossible can override the order Paul requires.
Paul’s instruction concerning women in 1 Corinthians 14 also belongs to his ordering of speech and authority. I read it in connection with the weighing of what is said and the authority Scripture assigns in the church. We cannot erase that instruction or make it a ban on every audible participation, since chapter 11 acknowledges women praying and prophesying under biblical order. Authoritative teaching and church governance remain entrusted to qualified men.
“Let him speak to himself and to God” is part of the command to remain silent when no interpreter is present. The speaker must not address the church in words the congregation cannot understand. This does not establish a normal practice of nonlinguistic prayer for every Christian. Acts describes recognizable languages, and Paul has already explained that not all believers speak in tongues.
Romans 8 supplies no such requirement either. The Spirit makes intercession with groanings too deep for words; Paul does not identify those groanings as a believer’s gift of tongues. Nor does Scripture instruct Christians to copy another person’s sounds, produce coached syllables, or surrender mental control to obtain a gift.
At the end of 1 Corinthians 14, Paul tells the church both not to forbid speaking with tongues and to do all things decently and in order. We need to obey both commands. Fear does not authorize me to prohibit a genuine gift, and enthusiasm does not authorize someone else to ignore its limits (1 Corinthians 14:39-40).
Testing Tongues Without Forbidding a Genuine Gift
A church should examine a claim without mocking the person who makes it or accepting it simply because he is sincere. No one should be pressured to perform, and private revelation must never outrank Scripture. The Word that requires discernment also tells us not to forbid the gift. Mark includes new tongues among signs accompanying the gospel’s spread (Mark 16:14-20).
“He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned. And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.”
Mark’s closing passage does not say every believer will display every sign, and it does not cancel Paul’s instructions for the gathering. The Lord confirms His word according to His will. Mark places condemnation on unbelief, while Acts 10 has already shown people receiving the Spirit before water baptism. Neither a sign nor baptism earns or produces salvation.
A credible modern manifestation would involve a real language the speaker had not acquired through ordinary learning. Public speech would require truthful interpretation, and recognition by someone who knows the language would be valuable evidence. I would not accept an interpretation on the speaker’s insistence alone if it changes with each telling or is placed beyond examination.
The congregation must also examine what the interpretation says. If it contradicts Scripture, it is false. Flattering the speaker or manipulating the hearers gives immediate reason for suspicion. A claim cannot establish new doctrine above God’s word or authorize a prophetic date. A leader must not shame believers for lacking tongues or coach them to imitate sounds so that the group can claim a manifestation occurred.
The way people speak is part of that examination. When several speak over one another, the congregation cannot receive an orderly interpretation of what each has said. Paul permits two or at most three, each waiting his turn. A church should require that sequence, an accountable interpretation, and respect for biblical leadership. If no interpreter is present, the speaker must remain silent, however intense the occasion becomes.
Testing a claim is not quenching the Spirit. Scripture tells us to test all things and hold fast what is good, protecting both the congregation and the person making the claim. Honest examination also prevents people from using Christ’s name to defend something He has not done. We should be willing to acknowledge that a claimed manifestation was not genuine rather than maintain a religious performance.
Conduct needs examination too, without treating giftedness as proof of maturity. Corinth had spiritual manifestations while its members tolerated immorality, pursued lawsuits against one another, and allowed rivalry and selfishness to disrupt church life. Their gifts did not excuse those sins. We should look for the Spirit’s fruit and require every message to submit to Scripture.
Missionaries should study languages diligently rather than expect a miracle on demand. God may enable a worker to speak a language he has not learned, or provide help through years of study and the service of translators. Supernaturally supplied speech would be the miraculous gift; learned speech would be His ordinary provision. Neither makes one worker superior to another.
If God gives tongues, receive the gift humbly and follow His instructions. If He does not, serve with what He has supplied. Teaching, mercy, practical help, generosity, encouragement, and faithful leadership all benefit the body. These ministries come from the same Spirit and meet real needs, even when few people notice who does the work. None of us serves apart from God’s grace.
Above all, no sign can take the place of the Savior. Jesus is the eternal Son, fully God and fully man, born of a virgin and without sin. Wicked men tortured and crucified Him, while He voluntarily gave Himself to be slain as the perfect sacrifice for our sins. His saving work through His shed blood and death was complete before His burial and bodily resurrection. He died for the whole world, so God’s offer of salvation is genuine even though people can resist and reject it. The Father did not punish, curse, abandon, strike, bruise, or pour wrath on Jesus. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit remained united, with no broken fellowship in the Godhead.
Repent and believe in the crucified and risen Son. The believer is forgiven and justified, meaning declared righteous before God, and becomes a new creation through the new birth. The Spirit indwells and seals every true believer, whose salvation is eternally secure in Christ. A superficial profession of faith does not establish that someone was saved, and being secure in Christ gives us no permission to live lawlessly. The Spirit works in us to produce obedience, which neither earns nor keeps salvation; new birth does not mean sinless perfection. Our confidence rests in Christ and His blood, rather than a sound, an emotional state, or our ability to persuade a congregation that a gift occurred.
My Final Thoughts
I understand tongues to be supernatural speech in real language the speaker did not learn. Scripture does not make it proof of salvation or a higher spiritual standing. It calls us to pursue love, test what is claimed, and insist on understanding and order when the church gathers. We should neither stage a manifestation nor forbid what God may give. Whatever gifts He supplies, our responsibility is to use them in service to Christ and His people.